Tim Smit explains that "this hippy shit!" moment
You want to hear a call to arms that rings with real urgency and passion? Last Wednesday at the Sustainable Development Commission Breakthrough Ideas for the 21st Century meeting in London Tim Smit stood and complained that what he was hearing was “hippy shit”.
It was a comment that injected an abrupt note of dischord a day that would include encouraging speeches from Jonathan Porritt, David Dimbleby, Prince Charles, Ed Miliband and Welsh Environment Minister Jane Davidson. But for listeners disappointed that the the day – up to Smit’s intervention – had lacked the sense of urgency that the situation demanded, and who were concerned that the notion of “sustainability” remains a frustratingly parochial concern, it was a breath of air in a stuffy room.
But Smit made his remark as an intervention from the floor. What did he really mean by it? I emailed the Eden Project founder on Wednesday night asking if he’d be interested in the chance to explain it a little further. This is his reply:
I was trying to say a simple thing and that is this;
“The next forty years will see us needing to cut our carbon footprint by 80% and if that is what we believe now the lessons of the last few years would imply that even this timescale is conservative as humans seem to have no intrinsic understanding of exponential change, only linear change. This means that every child in school today will live through changes that will be as major as imagining a leap from pre-industrial society into the middle of it. These changes cannot be assimilated to even contemplated as the sum of billions of small individual events of a ‘lifestyle choice’ variety. While it is true that the cultural changes which will see us recycle, insulate, travel less embrace renewable energy solutions and so on, will make a difference, these are actions based on the individual and our self perception as individual actors with choice as our right and consumption as our economic driver. It is in building community resilience and awareness that the future lies and to succeed in this we need a new narrative, one that describes the sunny uplands our society is striving to reach and the reason why adopting a philosophy which sees us recognising out part in and responsibility to the natural world will see us working with the grain of nature and not against it. My comment about ‘hippy shit’ was in no way meant to decry the efforts of those who are encouraging the first steps in community action through various mediums such as growing your own and so on, merely that we have been here before many times and the danger of becoming over impressed with such steps is that it drowns out the scream from the future that a truly radical shift in philosophy and leadership is required – one that questions the fundamentals of the way we do business, measure growth and take on responsibilities as citizens as opposed to just being aware of our rights. I feel awkward because I do not wish to be anything but supportive to the committed, but I believe we are entering, or maybe have already entered a period that future generations may come to regard as important as the start of the renaissance. For this to be true we need to be collectively far angrier, intellectually more incisive and offer realistic alternative routes to the future which take on board the realities of the size and complexity of the global population and don’t retreat into intellectual masturbation about ideals that just are undeliverable.The tragedy of our generation could well be that our institutions, both private and public are based on military or mechanistic hierarchies which have many things to commend them but adaptability isn’t one of them. I have spoken frequently to top civil servants both here and in Europe and they voice private despair at the structural and decision making prisons they have built for themselves and an accountability that is more often based on ‘audit’ than human outcomes. Their outlook is bleak because of the almost total lack of real leadership. A revolution is necessary and it cannot be achieved by a simple democratic process – were it so the world would still be flat. I hold to the view that Mark Twain famously noted, ‘If it is true that reasonable men bend themselves to the ways of the world, then only the unreasonable can change it.’ This is very good and in our terms today should maybe be translated as ‘if it ain’t broke – smash it’ (as someone has obviously got a vested interest in it!).”
So… sorry for the long reply, but “Hippy Shit” can appear like a cheap shot from the sidelines and does disservice to “Hippies” as we both know that many ex-hippies run the monster organisations that have become household names – you had to be lateral and brave to be a real hippy, but hippy shit is the unthinking touchy feely language of togetherness and harmony without a roadmap or a narrative.
The arguments that we need change have all been won: it’s exhausting hearing them rehearsed again and again. To actually activate people, to enbolden them to be able to grapple with what needs to be done, we eloquent, furious voices like this.
Comments
5 Comments on Tim Smit explains that "this hippy shit!" moment
-
Todd on
Wed, 8th Jul 2009 7:34 am
-
joe on
Thu, 9th Jul 2009 9:02 pm
-
Andy Middleton on
Sat, 11th Jul 2009 8:21 pm
-
“the scream from the future” « mark-wallace.net on
Sun, 12th Jul 2009 4:21 pm
-
Rhodri on
Mon, 27th Jul 2009 5:20 pm
Action. Not policy debate. Tim is right. Hidden in his comment is the power of leading from the middle. “hippies run the monster organisations that have become household names(!)”. History is a great teacher. It has not been policy that has changed the world, it’s been people getting engaged in a way that engages others.
Thanks for sharing Tim’s comments.
Not so long ago I asked several leading environmentalists why there wasn’t more talk about the inevitability of drastic changes to our lifestyles and constant crap about making significant changes by changing lightbulbs and installing wind turbines. One said that whilst it was probably true we’ve gone past the point of no return, that wasn’t a message anyone wanted to hear. Another said that the position of right-thinking, fair-minded people was to be ‘planetary hospice workers’ – commiting ourselves to working with those most affected by the changes and training ourselves whilst we still can.
If that isn’t scary, I don’t know what is.
Tim frequently seems to talk sense, and is doing so again here. The ‘hippy shit’ is found in lots of well meaning community groups who try to make change happen, but lack the project management, enterprise, communication and marketing skills to take big projects and break them into small, doable, measurable chunks.
In Wales, there’s more than glimmer of hope as the Welsh Assembly’s Climate Change team start pushing all Ministers and Local Authority leaders for route maps that show how they’re going to deliver the programmes and projects that a) they know how to do, b) save money, c) reduce carbon.
A large part of my focus this side of the border is creating space for politicians to lead by giving community groups and those on the edge of the hippy space the language and tools to show their leaders the way.
There’s way too much self-congratulation in the ether that although wonderful in that it shows good projects at work, belies the scale of change that we need to achieve.
[...] Tim Smit, founder of the Eden Project, said “this is all just hippy shit”. (In a post to the RSA Arts & Ecology website he later explained “the danger of becoming [...]
Tim voices the thoughts that have been in my head this summer. I am beginning to think that we have gone way beyond a reasonable response and that the time will come soon where anger and uncompromising commitment to a belief that the whole system is at fault and needs to be changed is justified and will lead us to acts of revolution. Today I read the Undercurrents reports on the cancellation of the Big Green Gathering. http://undercurrentsvideo.blogspot.com/2009/07/more-insight-into-closure-of-big-green.html
What on earth is going on in our society? We have a vacuum of morals, ideals and principles among our political class. This time resembles the decadent decay of the Roman empire. Idols are falling, the system is failing, as in nature, a new growth will emerge from the decay.
In a time of crisis we face a choice between reactionary forces that prey on fear and a fresh, brave vision of a better world. Ask yourselves which of the political parties provide the latter?
This is the start of a new Renaissance as Tim says. Art is not a consumer activity, a business, an investment opportunity – it is the expression of hope and anguish that comes from our deepest selves as we stare into the face of destruction and yearn for a new beginning beyond the horror of decay. Now is a time for leadership and we will not get it from the snake oil salesmen who offer themselves as leaders but as in every revolution, leadership comes from thinkers, artists and active citizens.
Tell me what you're thinking...
and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!


